NOTES ABOUT THE
BUTTERFLY AND MOTH PHOTOS
Tom Peterson
Butterfly
photos.
Unless otherwise noted, photos are of free, unrestrained
butterflies. Photos are mostly of local butterflies, in Kane County or
western DuPage County, Illinois. Many of the photos were taken at Nelson
Lake Marsh, about 8 miles west of Fermilab in Kane County, Illinois, where I am
a volunteer butterfly monitor.
Photos
through the year 2001 were taken with my personal Sony Hi-8 camcorder and
video-captured using "Snappy" (by Play, Inc.) on my Dell PC at
home. One might think, as I did at first, that it would be easy to wave
the camcorder at active butterflies and select good shots with video-capture
software. However, not only does a camcorder, like any camera, have a
certain "shutter speed" which cannot freeze rapid motion, but I found
that much video is not in truly sharp focus. So I use the camera much
like a still camera, manually focussing and manually adjusting exposure with a
resting butterfly in view. Thus, I end up with about 5 to 10 seconds of
video per shot, and the whole summer of photos requires only about an hour of
video tape. It is quite easy to select and capture just the desired pose
on screen from video of, for example, a butterfly pumping its wings or actively
getting nectar at a flower. Although the quality of video capture is
limited, the camcorder is an easy way to obtain reasonably good photos.
From 2002
through 2005, most photos are taken with a Nikon 885 digital camera, providing
better resolution and better color. One of my first with this camera and
still one of my favorites is of the mating pair of Great
Spangled Fritillaries.
In 2006, I
switched to a Canon A620, and since 2010 most photos have been taken with a
Canon G11. I use the compact "point and shoot" camera in
close-up mode, just a few inches from the butterflies. This allows me to
easily carry the camera on walks in order to take advantage of opportunities.
Photos are then mostly in natural light, without flash, although I have found “fill
flash” in bright sun often provides more uniform lighting.
The problem with this method, of course, is to get very
close to resting butterflies. Some butterflies, like the Coppers and the Gray Comma,
make it easy by repeatedly returning to the same flower or perch. A cool,
sunny day when the butterfly is warming itself in the sun or an extremely
attractive nectar source like thistle can provide relatively tame
butterflies. However, many of the photos, like those of the female dark
form of the the Tiger
Swallowtail, were just lucky encounters, and the butterflies were gone
seconds after shooting the picture.
Moth
photos.
Unlike the butterflies, many of the moth photos are of
captive individuals. Many moths rest with wings folded tent-like over
their bodies, but the hind wings may provide important clues for
identification. Since many of these moths rest so soundly during the day,
one can push the front wing forward to reveal the hind wing. I like to
manipulate the moth this way in captivity, in case it does try to fly before I
get a decent photo. Captive moths are generally placed on a sheet of
white paper for photography. Thus, you will see some photos of moths on
white paper, often with one front wing lifted to reveal the hind wing.
Except for a few invasive pests like the gypsy moths, I release those moths
which I have captured after photographing them.