Letter to the Editor: The LHC and the SSC
We should all celebrate the first beam in the LHC. This event indeed
marks a new era of scientific discovery. At the same time many of us may
look back wistfully at what might have been.
In May of 1982, Leon Lederman assembled a small group of people in a
small office on the second floor of the High Rise. First beam in the
Tevatron was still a year away. While the Tevatron was a daring first use of
superconducting magnets in a large accelerator, those
of us around the table that day had no doubt that it would be
successful. Bob Wilson and Dick Lundy were there. (I was there as
Lundy’s deputy at the Technical Support Section where the Tevatron
magnets were being built.)
Leon had big plans on his mind. He asked us to think about how we would
design a really big machine that would make bold leap to a new physics
frontier. We now knew how to build the magnets. We just needed to scale
up the Tevatron by a factor of ten. The next month at Snowmass, Leon
revealed his dream to the community. I remember these as heady, exciting
times. We worked obsessively, day and night, during those weeks at
Snowmass, turning Leon’s dream into something that could actually be
built. As the same time, huge new detectors were being designed for the
energies and luminosities envisaged for this marvelous machine.
For the next 11 years we worked hard to realize the SSC. Using the
Tevatron experience, we designed better, cheaper magnets. A site was
selected, tunnels started, concrete poured, and magnets tested. We made
countless trips back and forth to Berkeley, home of the SSC Central
Design Group, and to Waxahachie.
Then...in October of 1993 it all came crashing down. Congress voted to
terminate the project. The future of US leadership in high energy
physics lay in the wreckage of the SSC.
The success of the LHC is a great victory for science. Although I am
happy for the LHC, I am also sad about what might have been.
--Paul Mantsch
Paul Mantsch is project manager for the Pierre Auger Observatory.
|