higgsfact.tex:cooling channel employed in Study-II~\cite{EPP:studyii}, whereas the
higgsfact.tex:Study-II, all cells are strictly identical, and the presence of an
higgsfact.tex:cavities. The input tracks are taken from a Study-II simulation, using
higgsfact.tex:The use of Study-II
higgsfact.tex:Study-II cooling lattice, with no windows, is 13. With realistic
higgsfact.tex:the Study-II example.
higgsfact.tex:This ring could not be used, as is, to replace the Study-II cooling
higgsfact.tex: There have been preliminary attempts to study colliders of
introduction.tex:such are worthy of vigorous scientific study.
introduction.tex:undertaken the study of designing a Neutrino Factory, along with R\&D
introduction.tex:These properties permit the study of non-oscillation physics at near
introduction.tex:enable the study of CP violation in the lepton sector. (It is known that CP
introduction.tex:planned in New York in 2003~\cite{nufact03}. There are also efforts in Europe~\cite{europenf} and Japan~\cite{japannf} to study different approaches to realizing the neutrino factory.
introduction.tex:Feasibility Study (``Study-I'') of an entry-level Neutrino Factory~\cite
introduction.tex:{INTRO:ref1}. Study-I showed that the evolution of the Fermilab accelerator
introduction.tex:reached in Study-I, characterized in terms of the number of 50-GeV muon
introduction.tex:Simultaneously, Fermilab launched a study of the physics that might be
introduction.tex:a study to compare the physics reach of a Neutrino Factory with that of
introduction.tex:Subsequently, BNL organized a follow-on study 
introduction.tex:(``Study-II'')~\cite{EPP:studyii} on a
introduction.tex:Study-II demonstrated that BNL was likewise a suitable site for a Neutrino
introduction.tex:Factory. Based on the improvements in Study-II, the number of 20-GeV muon
introduction.tex:Both Study-I and -II are site specific in that each has a few site-dependent
introduction.tex:aspects; otherwise, they are generic. In particular, Study-I assumed a new
introduction.tex:ring. Study-II assumed BNL site-specific proton driver specifications
introduction.tex:between the two studies is that Study-II aimed at a lower muon energy (20
introduction.tex:GeV), but higher intensity (for physics reach) than Study-I. Taking the two
introduction.tex:{studycomp} shows a comparison of the performance of the Neutrino Factory
introduction.tex:designs in Study-I and Study-II~\cite{INTRO:ref9} with the physics
introduction.tex:\centerline{\includegraphics[width=4.0in]{studyIvsII.eps}}
introduction.tex:\label{studycomp}
introduction.tex:\caption[Schematic of the Neutrino Factory Study-II version]{Schematic of
introduction.tex:the Neutrino Factory Study-II version.}
introduction.tex:based on the Study-II design, and indicate a scientifically productive
mice.tex:which is based on two cells of the Feasibility Study II ``Lattice 1"
mice.tex:this study the effect of the cooling apparatus was ``turned off" so as
mice.tex:CERN study) elucidates further experimental issues. As shown in
neufact.tex:based on the most recent Feasibility Study (Study-II)~\cite{EPP:studyii}
neufact.tex:The proton driver considered in Study-II is an upgrade of the BNL
neufact.tex:MARS code~\cite{MARSstudyii}. To avoid mechanical fatigue problems, a
neufact.tex:ceramic insulation to withstand radiation. MARS~\cite{MARSstudyii}
neufact.tex:In Study-I, the target was a solid carbon rod. At high beam energies, this
neufact.tex:under consideration, as discussed in Study-II \cite{EPP:studyii}. Clearly
neufact.tex:In Study-I, where the final beam energy was chosen to be 50 GeV, a second
neufact.tex:superconducting coils. For Study-II, a magnet design has been chosen that
neufact.tex:For Study-I, a conventional superconducting ring was utilized to store the
neufact.tex:The detector site taken for Study-II is the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant
neufact.tex:proposed to study both proton decay and cosmic neutrinos. UNO would be a
neufact.tex:both Study-I and Study-II, that the Target Facility is built from the outset
neufact.tex:to accommodate a 4 MW beam. Based on the Study-II results, a 1 MW beam would
neufact.tex:Study-II, this stage takes us to the end of the cooling channel. Thus, we
neufact.tex:the end of Lattice 2 in the Study-II cooling channel would result in an
physics.tex:Here we discuss~\cite{study2} the current evidence for neutrino 
physics.tex:In what follows, we shall take the design values from Study-II
physics.tex:Fermilab Neutrino Factory study~\cite{INTRO:ref9}. For
physics.tex:For the Study II design, in accordance with the previous
physics.tex:Fermilab study~\cite{INTRO:ref9}, 
physics.tex:\subsection{Non-oscillation physics at a Neutrino Factory} The study
physics.tex:extensive study on this topic~\cite{cern-nonosc}.  A Neutrino Factory
physics.tex:constants, the study of spin-transfer phenomena, and the study of
physics.tex:for quantitative studies of nuclear models.  The study of $\Lambda$
physics.tex:CERN study group, which assumed a facility  with a 4 MW proton 
physics.tex:values as small as $\sim 0.003\%$ for studying a light SM-like $\h$.
physics.tex:for $R=0.01\%-0.003\%$ required for studying the $\hl$.
prstab.tex:\bibitem{INTRO:ref6}  \textsl{Muon-Muon Collider: A Feasibility Study},
prstab.tex:%Feasibility Study of a Neutrino Factory Based on a Muon Storage Ring}, 
prstab.tex:%(http://www.fnal.gov/projects/muon\_collider/nu-factory/fermi\_study\_after\_april1st/) 
prstab.tex:Feasibility Study of a Neutrino Source Based on a Muon Storage Ring},
prstab.tex:http://www.fnal.gov/projects/muon\_collider/nu/study/study.html.
prstab.tex:\bibitem{EPP:studyii}  S. Ozaki, R. Palmer, M.~S. Zisman, and J. Gallardo,
prstab.tex:Editors, \textsl{Feasibility Study-II of a Muon-Based Neutrino Source},
prstab.tex:http://www.cap.bnl.gov/mumu/studyii/FS2-report.html.
prstab.tex:\bibitem{ICARUS}  F.~Arneodo \textit{et al.}, \textsl{Study of Solar
prstab.tex:\bibitem{study2}Some of the text quoted here appears in the Study II document
prstab.tex:\cite{EPP:studyii}. We would like to thank Robert Shrock for helpful comments.
prstab.tex:%http://www.fnal.gov/projects/muon\_collider/nu/study/study.html.
prstab.tex:{\it Proceedings of the 1982 DPF Summer Study on Elementary Particles and
prstab.tex:%``Prospective study of muon storage rings at CERN,''
prstab.tex:%J.~F.~Gunion,``Detecting and studying Higgs bosons,'' in {\it 
prstab.tex:%\bibitem{Studyiireport}  S. Ozaki, R. Palmer, M.~S. Zisman, and J. Gallardo,
prstab.tex:%Editors, \textsl{Feasibility Study-II of a Muon-Based Neutrino Source},
prstab.tex:\textsl{The Proton Driver Design Study}, FERMILAB-TM-2136 (December 2000).
prstab.tex:\bibitem{MARSstudyii} N. Mokhov, \textsl{Particle Production and
prstab.tex:\textsl{Fermilab Proton Driver Physics Study Website} is at
prstab.tex:%``BNL Neutrino Factory Feasibility Study II'', May 2001. To be 
prstab.tex:Proceedings of the 6-Month Feasibility Study, Oct00-Apr01,
prstab.tex:{\textsl Beam Dynamics Study of a Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment}, 
r_and_d.tex:\item  Study of muon beam dynamics at large longitudinal space-charge
r_and_d.tex:multipactor effects. It will also be used to study the dark current effects
r_and_d.tex:\subsubsection{Feasibility Study-II}
r_and_d.tex:The MC has participated heavily in a second Feasibility Study for a
r_and_d.tex:Neutrino Factory, co-sponsored by BNL. The results of the study were quite
r_and_d.tex:our Feasibility Study that a Neutrino Factory could be sited at either FNAL
r_and_d.tex:In addition to work on Study-II, our present effort has focused on
r_and_d.tex:15-T field is under study.
r_and_d.tex:will be the same as that adopted in our previous Feasibility Study efforts.)