Neutrino Factory Physics Study Plots

Kerrys Plot Area
Rajas Plot Area
  • Superbeams draft report

  • Steves Talk at the 2 day meeting for the neutrino factory physics study, 17-18 Feb, 2000.

  • sin2 2theta(13) reach summary plot

    Superbeam plots
  • Fig. 3 for superbeams paper

  • Very long baseline conventional beam setup at FNAL

  • Decay channel length versus baseline for conventional beams at FNAL

  • Pion decay fraction versus baseline for conventional beams at FNAL

  • Superbeam sin**2 2theta(13) sensitivity vs E and L: Rate table for WBB, LAr

  • Superbeam sin**2 2theta(13) sensitivity vs E and L: Rate table for NBB, water C

  • NUMI medium energy beam, baseline 2800 km, s2 2theta(13) = 0.01

  • NUMI medium energy beam, baseline 2800 km, s2 2theta(13) = 0.04

  • Draft paper

    Figures for entry level and beyond paper

  • Fig. X1 Wrong-sign muon CC interaction spectrum versus muon threshold energy.

  • Fig. X2 sin**2 2theta(13) reach for 10 nue->numu event observation vs L and dm(32)**2.

  • Fig. X3 Thresholds of interest summary plot

  • Fig. X4 sin**2 2theta(13) reach for 3 sigma sign of dm(32)**2 vs L with E = 20 GeV.

  • Fig. X5 sin**2 2theta(13) reach for 3 sigma sign of dm(32)**2 vs L and E.

  • Fig. X6 sin**2 2theta(13) reach for 3 sigma for (a) delta = 0 vs +pi/2 with dm**2 positive, (b) delta = 0 vs +pi/2 with dm**2 negative, (c)delta = 0 vs -pi/2 with dm**2 positive, and (d) delta = 0 vs -pi/2 with dm**2 negative. vs L and E for 10**21 decays and a 50 kt detector.

  • Fig. X8 Tau appearance event rates versus sin**2 2 theta(13) and delta m**2(32) for E = 20 GeV, L = 2800 km.

  • Fig. X9 sin**2 2 theta(13) reach for 10 nue -> nutau events versus baseline and energy.

    Getting ready for short baseline paper

  • nue - nutau / nebar -> nutau bar for scenario IB1 (LSND+ATMOS) and numu -> nutau / numubar -> nutau bar rates versus delta -> Fig. 1 of paper. Normalization for error bars is a 1 kt detector, 3 years running, 10**20 decays/yr, 30 percent efficiency.

  • nue - nutau for scenario IB1 (LSND+ATMOS) and numu -> nutau CC rates versus delta.

    Other plots

  • Fig.16 sin**2 2theta(13) reach for CP sensitivity versus L and Emu

  • Fig.15 Wrong-sign muon CC interaction spectrum versus muon threshold energy.

  • Fig.14 Sin**2 2theta(13)for 3 sig sign delta m**2 vs Emu and Baseline - parameter point IA1. Emin = 4 GeV, M = 50 kt. 10**20 decays.

  • Fig.13 Physics interest versus muon energy and intensity: summary plot for three-flavor oscillation scenario.

  • Fig.12 nu(e) -> nu(tau) appearance rates versus delta for Emu = 20 GeV, L = 60 km - parameter point IB1 (3-flavor, LSND + Atmos.)

  • Fig.11 Tau appearance rates versus baseline and stored mu- energy, for delta = 0 and 90 deg - parameter point IB1 (3-flavor, LSND + Atmos.)

  • Fig.10 Tau appearance rates versus baseline and stored mu+ energy, for delta = 0 and 90 deg - parameter point IB1 (3-flavor, LSND + Atmos.)

  • Fig.9 Relative wrong-sign mu rates versus baseline for delta = 0 and 90 deg - parameter point IA1 with dm**2 = 0.002, 0.005 eV**2 and Emu = 20 GeV, Emin = 4 GeV.

  • Fig.8 Sin**2 2theta(13)for 10 events vs dm**2 and Baseline - parameter point IA1. Emu = 20 GeV, Emin = 4 GeV.

  • Fig.7 Total CC rate (no oscillations) vs baseline - Emu = 20 GeV, 50 kt detector, 10**19 decays.

  • Fig.6 Sin**2 2theta(13)for 3 sig sign delta m**2 vs dm**2 and Baseline - parameter point IA1. Emu = 20 GeV, Emin = 4 GeV, M = 50 kt. 10**20 decays.

  • Fig.5 Sin**2 2theta(13)for 10 events vs dm**2 and Emin - parameter point IA1. Emu = 20 GeV, L = 732 km.

  • Fig.4 Sin**2 2theta(13)for 10 events vs dm**2 and Emin - parameter point IA1. Emu = 20 GeV, L = 7332 km.

  • Fig.3 Minimum Sin**2 2theta(13) - parameter point IA1

  • Fig.2 Minimum Sin**2 2theta(13) - parameter point IA2

  • Fig.1 Minimum Sin**2 2theta(13) - parameter point IA3

  • HIMUS99 workshop writeup

    Last updated 9th Jan, 2000
    S. Geer sgeer@fnal.gov