Physics Advisory Committee
June 18-23, 2005
Aspen Colorado
CHARGE
General
We would like you to produce
a written report on the state of the physics program at the Laboratory. That report should be based on the
presentations and discussions at the Aspen meeting and other background
material as needed.
Tevatron Collider Physics
You will hear brief status
reports on the accelerator operations of Run II at the Tevatron and on the
associated experimental program. We
would like you to consider how the physics prospects evolve with time over the
duration of Run II. It is important for
the Laboratory to have a clear and up-to-date understanding of these prospects,
especially in light of the anticipated charge to HEPAP and its sub-panel P5.
Please comment on the status
and prospects for Run II at the Tevatron.
Neutrinos
You will hear about the
status of both operating neutrino experiments.
MiniBooNE has now received more than 5.5E20 protons on target
(pot). The NuMI/MINOS beamline and
experiment are now in the first phase of operations, with about 1E19 pot. You will also hear an update of the plans for
increasing the proton intensity. This
will provide a context for discussion of the MINOS run plan, which was first
submitted to the Laboratory during 2003 and which was deferred pending further
progress with NuMI and better understanding of the potential. In addition, when it recommended Stage I
approval for NOvA at its April Meeting, the PAC also asked for some issues to
be clarified.
Please comment on the MINOS
Run Plan and the progress of NOvA since the April meeting.
Proton Driver Physics
Over the course of the past
year, a group led by Steve Geer has developed the physics case for a proton
driver and submitted a written report to the Director. We will use this document in discussions
about the Proton Driver with the Department of Energy. Steve Geer will give a presentation based on
the physics report and will be available to respond to questions. The status report on Accelerator R&D at
Fermilab will include a section on the proton driver.
Please comment on the
evolving physics case for the proton driver and make any appropriate
recommendation.
Astroparticle Physics
The natural evolution of the
experimental astroparticle physics program at the Laboratory has led to some
new initiatives. We anticipate that
sometime during the next year we will want to discuss the major directions for
this program.
Please comment on the
astroparticle physics program and make any appropriate recommendations.
ILC
The PAC will hear plans for
accelerator R&D and for detector R&D associated with the ILC. One of
the major changes at the laboratory is the rapid growth of the ILC accelerator
effort. The ILC detector effort,
although smaller, could rapidly develop into a significant part of the program,
including the test beam effort.
Please comment on the
appropriateness of the plans for the ILC effort at Fermilab.
General R&D
The PAC will also hear about
aspects of R&D at the Laboratory that are not directed at one of the major
programs called out in this charge.
Please comment on these
smaller R&D efforts, and on whatever omissions you think should be
corrected.
Future Program at the Laboratory
The outgoing Director will
give a status report on the Fermilab research program and the incoming Director
will give his vision for the future of the Laboratory. These presentations should give a full view
of the Laboratory and give the context for the specific projects under
discussion at this meeting.
The PAC should discuss and
comment on the future directions of the Laboratory and the evolution from the
present.